Haptics Bibliography

During my research I have been trying, as time permits, to read and annotate important haptic related papers. As soon as I get the chance, they will ALL appear in this space.

The Webster Dictionary defines haptic as:

hap-tic \'hap-tik\ adj
[ISV, fr. Gk haptesthai to touch]
(1890)
1: relating to or based on the sense of touch
2: characterized by a predilection for the sense of touch (a haptic person)

References

1: B. D. Adelstein and M. J. Rosen. Design and implementation of a force reflective manipulandum for manual control research. Proc. of DSC-Vol. 42, Advances in Robotics, ASME Winter Annual Meeting., pages 1-12, 1992. Anaheim, CA.
2: T. L. Brooks. Telerobotic response requirements. IEEE Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1990.
3: T. L. Brooks. Telerobotic response requirements. STX Publication ROB 90-03, 1990.
4: C.G.L. Cao, C.L. MacKenzie, and S. Payandeh. Task and motion analyeses in endoscopic surgery. In K. Danai, editor, Proceedings of ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division, volume 58 of DSC, pages 567-573. 1996 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 1996.
5: J. E. Colgate and J. M. Brown. Factors affecting the z-width of a haptic display. International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 3205-3210, 1994. San Diego, CA.
6: J.E. Colgate, M.C. Stanley, and J.M. Brown. Issues in the haptic display of tool use. IROS '95, IEEE/RJS Int. Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 1995.
7: R.E. Ellis, N. Sarkar, and M.A. Jenkins. Numerical methods for the haptic presentation of contact: Theory, simulations, and experiments. In K. Danai, editor, Proceedings of ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division, volume 58 of DSC, pages 413-420. 1996 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 1996.
8: E.D. Fasse and N. Hogan. Quantative measurement of haptic perception. IEEE Int. Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 3199-3204, 1994.
9: P. Fischer, R. Daniel, and K.V. Siva. Specification and design of input devices for teleoperation. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1:540-545, 1990.
10: V. Hayward. Toward a seven-axis haptic device. IROS '95, IEEE/RJS Int. Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 1995.
11: V. Hayward and O.R. Astley. Performance measures for haptic interfaces. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Robotics Research, Muncih, Germany, 1995. Springer-Verlag.
12: V. Hayward, J. Choksi, G. Lanvin, and C. Ramstein. Design and multi-objective optimization of a linkage for a haptic interface. Advances in Robot Kinematics, pages 352-359, 1994. J. Lenarcic and B. Ravani (Eds.), Kluver Academic.
13: J. W. Hill, P. S. Green, J. F. Jensen, and Y. Gorfu. Telepresence surgery demonstration system. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 2302-2307, 1994. San Diego, CA,.
14: R. Hui and P. Gregorio. The virtual handle. IROS '95, IEEE/RJS Int. Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 1995.
15: R. Hui, A. Ouellet, A. Wang, P. Kry, S. Williams, G. Vukovich, and W. Perussini. Mechanisms for haptic feedback. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 2138-2143, 1995.
16: H. Iwata. Pen-based haptic virtual environment. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 287-292, 1993.
17: A. J. Kelly and S. E. Salcudean. Magicmouse: Tactile and kinesthetic feedback in the human-computer interface using an electromagneticaly actuated input/output device. Technical Paper, 1993.
18: R.L. Klatzky, K.A. Purdy, and S.J. Lederman. When is vision useful during a familiar manipulatory task. In K. Danai, editor, Proceedings of ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division, volume 58 of DSC, pages 567-573. 1996 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 1996.
19: R.B. Kuppersmith, R. Johnston, S.B. Jones, and H.A. Jenkins. Virtual reality surgical simulation and otolaryngology. Arch. Otolaryngol Head neck Surg., 122, December 1996.
20: A. Lacreuse, J. Fagot, and J. Vauclair. Left versus right hand differences in exploratory strategies: Facts and relevance to the development of haptic devices. In K. Danai, editor, Proceedings of ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division, volume 58 of DSC, pages 567-573. 1996 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 1996.
21: D. A. Lawrence and J. D. Chapel. Performance trade-offs for hand controller design. IEEE Int. Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 3211-3216, 1994.
22: D.A. Lawrence, L.Y. Pao, M.A. Salada, and A.M. Dougherty. Quantitative experimental analysis of transparency and stability in haptic interfaces. In K. Danai, editor, Proceedings of ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division, volume 58 of DSC, pages 441-449. 1996 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 1996.
23: K.E. MacLean. The "haptic camera": A technique for characterizing and playing back haptic properties of real enviornments. In K. Danai, editor, Proceedings of ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division, volume 58 of DSC, pages 459-467. 1996 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 1996.
24: W.R. Mark, S.C. Randolph, M. Finch, J.M. Van Verth, and R.M. Taylor. Adding force feedback in graphics systems: issues and solutions. Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, pages 447-452, 1996.
25: T. H. Massie and J. K. Salisbury. The phantom interface: A device for probing virtual objects. ASME Winter Annual Meeting, Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for a virtual environment and teleoperator systems, November 1994.
26: D.A. McAffee and P. Fiorini. Hand controller design requirements and performance issues in telerobotics. Fifth International Conference on Advanced Robotics, 1:186-192, 1991.
27: M. Minsky and S.J. Lederman. Simlated haptic textures: Roughness. In K. Danai, editor, Proceedings of ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division, volume 58 of DSC, pages 421-426. 1996 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 1996.
28: H.N. Morgenbesser and M.A. Srinivasan. Force shading for haptic shape perception. In K. Danai, editor, Proceedings of ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division, volume 58 of DSC, pages 407-412. 1996 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 1996.
29: J.B. Morrell and J.K. Salisbury. Performance measures for robotic actuators. In K. Danai, editor, Proceedings of ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division, volume 58 of DSC, pages 531-537. 1996 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 1996.
30: D.K. Pai and L.M. Reissell. Touching multiresolution curves. In K. Danai, editor, Proceedings of ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division, volume 58 of DSC, pages 427-432. 1996 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 1996.
31: J.D.B. Paines. Design of a force reflecting hand controller for space telemanipulation studies. 33rd Congress of the International Federation, October 10-17 1987.
32: E. Pere, D. Gomez, G. Burdea, and N. Langrana. Pc-based virtual reality system with dextrous force feedback. In K. Danai, editor, Proceedings of ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division, volume 58 of DSC, pages 495-502. 1996 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 1996.
33: C. Ramstein. A multimodal user interface system with force feedback and physical models. Interact 95, 1995. Lillehammer, Norway.
34: C. Ramstein and V. Hayward. The pantograph: a large workspace haptic device for a multi-modal human-computer interaction. ACM/SIGCHI 1994 Conference on human factors in computing systems, Boston, MA, April 1994.
35: S.E. Salcudean and T.D. Vlaar. On the emulation of stiff walls and static friction with a magnetically levitated input/poutput device. ASME Winter Meeting, 1994.
36: S.E. Salcudean and N.M. Wong. Course-fine motion coordination and control of a teleopertion system with magnetically levitated master and wrist. Third international symposium on experimental robotics, 1993. LNCIS 200. Springer Verlag.
37: S.E. Salcudean, J. Yan, Z. Hu, and P.D. Lowen. Performance tradeoffs in optimzation-based teleoperation controller design with applications to microsurgery experiments. ASME Winter Meeting, 1995.
38: K. V. Siva, P. J. Fischer, M. H. Brown, and E. Abel. The development of a bilateral input device for use in teleoperation. Remote Handling and robotics department, AEA technology, Harwell laboratory, Oxon, OX11 0RA, U.K.
39: M.A. Srinivasan, G.L. Beauregard, and D.L. Brock. The impact of visual information on the haptic perception of stiffness in virtual environments. In K. Danai, editor, Proceedings of ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division, volume 58 of DSC, pages 555-559. 1996 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 1996.
40: L. Stocco and S. E. Salcudean. A coarse-fine aproach to force-reflecting hand controller design. Submitted to: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1996.
41: J. Vertut, G. Clement, R. Fournier, D. Francois, and G. Mercey. Ma23 contained maintenance servomanipulator. Proceedings of the 32nd conference on remote systems technology, pages 3-10, 1984.
42: J. Vertut, P. Marchal, G. Debrie, M. Petit, D. Francois, and P. Coiffet. The ma23 bilateral servomanipulator system. Proceedings of the 24th conference on remote systems technology, 1976.
43: J. Vertut, P. Marchal, J.C. Germond, D. Francois, and J.P. Brossard. Protection, transfer, and maintenance of the ma23 bilateral servomanipulator. Proceedings of the 26nd conference on remote systems technology, pages 125-133, 1978.
44: C.B. Zilles and J.K. Salisbury. A constraint-based god-object method for haptic display. IROS '95, IEEE/RJS Int. Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 1995.